QME record review vendor checklist
Short version: before you send a QME file to any vendor, get 14 things settled in writing: the BAA, who reads the file and where, the price per page, how duplicates are billed, turnaround in business days, page references on every line, a page count per sender, and what happens to the records afterwards. Tick them off below, then copy the request at the bottom and send it to every vendor on your shortlist.
Limits: Prices, turnaround and features come from each vendor's own website, read on 2026-11-12. We did not send any vendor a real file, so turnaround and quality are the vendors' claims. Nothing here is billing or legal advice.
Why a checklist for this purchase
Record review vendors sell the same words ("summary", "chronology", "review") for very different work, and 0 of the 12 services we checked publish a page rate. The questions below turn a sales call into answers you can compare. They come from 3 places: what the vendors' own pages leave unsaid, the disclosure a QME report needs under Labor Code 4628(b) (the name and qualifications of each person who performed non-clerical services), and the 30-day report clock in 8 CCR 38.
The 14 questions, as a checklist
Tick each item once you have the answer in writing. Your ticks stay in this browser tab only; nothing is sent or saved.
Privacy and people
Price
Output
Time
0 of 14 settled.
Test on a closed file before a live one
- Pick a closed QME file you have already served, with your declaration of records reviewed.
- Send it to 2 vendors under signed BAAs, with the same instructions.
- Compare each vendor's page count with your declaration.
- Check 10 random lines of each outline against the cited page: date, provider, finding, and any negative ("denies", "no evidence of") kept as a negative.
- Check the records from before the date of injury are there, in date order. Apportionment depends on them.
- Time it from upload to delivery and compare with the turnaround promised.
Request to copy and send
Paste this into an email to each vendor on your shortlist. Fill in the brackets. It asks for every item on the checklist in 1 message, so replies line up side by side.
Subject: Record review quote for a California QME practice Hello, I am a California QME reviewing about [number] files a month, usually [number] to [number] pages each. Before I send any records, please reply in writing with: 1. Your price per page for files under 500, 500 to 2,000 and over 2,000 pages, and any minimum, rush or redo fees. 2. Whether duplicate and blank pages are billed. 3. Turnaround in business days from upload for each of those page bands, and for a supplemental batch under 100 pages. 4. Who reads the file: names or roles, training, and the country where the work is done. 5. Whether AI processes the file, in what order with your staff, and whether my records are used to train any model. 6. A sample output showing a page reference on every line and a page count per sender and in total. 7. How you mark pages you could not read. 8. Your BAA, for signature before any records are sent. 9. How long you keep records and outputs after delivery, and how you confirm deletion. I plan to test 1 closed file first. Thank you, [Name], [credentials] [Practice name and phone]
Red flags in a vendor's reply
- A price per case with no page band, or "it depends" with no range.
- No BAA until after you sign up.
- Sample output in paragraphs with no page numbers.
- No answer on who reads the file or where.
- Turnaround described as "fast", "quick" or "flexible".
- Any offer to write your opinions, causation or impairment rating. Those are yours.
Questions about vetting a vendor
What is the first thing to ask a record review vendor?
Whether it will sign a BAA before you send any records. If the answer is no or later, stop there.
Why ask who reads the file?
Because the QME report must name each person who performed services beyond clerical preparation under Labor Code 4628(b), and you can't name people the vendor won't identify.
How many vendors should I test?
2, on the same closed file. More than that and the comparison takes longer than the reading it is meant to save.